
Is Vanguard More Rolls Royce, or Hyundai?
By Victor Haghani and James White “What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly.” – Thomas Paine, 1776 A physician thinking about investing with Elm asked us: “If I […]
By Victor Haghani and James White “What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly.” – Thomas Paine, 1776 A physician thinking about investing with Elm asked us: “If I […]
We must have said something insightful, because our coin-flipping research has been awarded the William F. Sharpe award for Institutional Investor Journals Paper of the Year!
It’s time to dispel one frequently-voiced myth about indexing: if investors put their money into index funds or ETFs, they’ve unintentionally increased the market’s aggregate mis-valuation.
In a recent interview, I was asked: “Should investors focus on fees or performance?” Later, I realized that implies we need to make a choice between fees and performance, but we don’t – we can enjoy low fees AND good performance.
Victor recently appeared on BloombergTV to discuss our blog post, “What’s all the hoopla? Passive indexers are still a rare breed.”
Everyone’s talking about how passive indexing is taking over. That may be a good or bad thing, depending on perspective, but a better question might be: is that what’s actually happening?
My daughter Jessica, a cognitive science major at university, caught me with a fun brain-teaser courtesy of Professor Phil Tetlock, author of “Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It?”
There are several plausible explanations for REITs’ recent strength – one intriguing explanation that you may have heard about involves an upcoming change in how REITs are classified in indexes.
If you’ve decided you want to invest in real estate, you may want to compare the merits of REITs versus investing in buildings directly…
The global equity market is a lot like a map: it’s a compromise. It’s system that’s worked for decades, but could we do better?